Equivalencies
Equivalency rules define how courses and exams from other institutions translate to credit at your institution. When students submit transcripts, Stellic uses these rules to automatically match courses and calculate transfer credits.
How equivalency matching works
When students upload transcripts:
OCR processing - The system reads course information from the transcript
Rule matching - Courses are compared against your existing equivalency rules
Credit calculation - Matching courses receive automatic credit awards
Flagging for review - Unmatched courses are flagged for staff evaluation
Evaluation outcomes
Credit awarded
Course matches an equivalency rule and transfers with specific credit
No credit
Course matches an equivalency rule that specifies no credit should be awarded
Requires review
No matching rule exists; staff must evaluate manually
Types of equivalencies
Direct equivalency
Course matches a specific course at your institution with the same credit value
BIO 101 at Source School → BIO 101 at your institution
Departmental equivalency
Course earns credit within a department without matching a specific course
PSY 250 at Source School → Psychology Elective (3 credits)
Elective credit
Course counts toward total degree credits without fulfilling a specific requirement. Configure by mapping to a catch-all course (e.g., GEN 999) via course-based rules or tags.
MUS 101 at Source School → General Elective (3 credits)
Creating equivalency rules
School-based rules
Define how courses from specific source institutions transfer to your institution. Set up matching criteria and credit assignments that apply automatically when transcripts are processed.
→ Create course equivalency rules
Exam-based rules
Configure equivalencies for standardized exams (AP, IB, CLEP, etc.). Set score thresholds and corresponding credits that apply automatically when students submit qualifying scores.
→ Create exam equivalency rules
Evaluation methods
When no equivalency rule exists, staff evaluate courses using:
Curriculum analysis
Faculty review course descriptions, learning outcomes, syllabi, credit hours, and prerequisites to assess rigor and alignment
Articulation agreements
Formal agreements with partner institutions that pre-establish equivalencies (common between community colleges and four-year universities)
External evaluation services
Third-party organizations assess specialized coursework (international transcripts, military training) and provide recommendations
Key decision factors
When evaluating courses without existing equivalency rules, consider:
Academic standards and accreditation requirements
Curriculum alignment with existing course offerings
Credit structure differences (quarter vs. semester systems)
Coursework recency, especially in rapidly evolving fields
Source institution's accreditation status
Best practices
Review rules regularly - Partner institutions update curricula; your rules should reflect current offerings
Document decisions - Record rationale for equivalency determinations to ensure consistency
Collaborate with departments - Faculty input improves matching accuracy for major requirements
Monitor outcomes - Track transfer student success to identify problematic equivalencies
Stay informed - Watch for changes at partner institutions, especially high-volume transfer sources
Last updated
Was this helpful?

